<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T Samsung Galaxy Note shown in leaked photos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/att-samsung-galaxy-note-shown-in-leaked-photos-01205298/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-samsung-galaxy-note-shown-in-leaked-photos-01205298/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 19:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-samsung-galaxy-note-shown-in-leaked-photos-01205298/#comment-168583</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 08:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=205298#comment-168583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That made absolutely no sense because, quite frankly, I could not be an Apple fanboy and post what I said with a serious face. Keep doing what you seem best at doing--resorting emotionally charged irrational statements without taking into account the merits of the comments to which you&#039;re replying. Seriously, the Apple fanboy talking points get old after a while. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That made absolutely no sense because, quite frankly, I could not be an Apple fanboy and post what I said with a serious face. Keep doing what you seem best at doing&#8211;resorting emotionally charged irrational statements without taking into account the merits of the comments to which you&#8217;re replying. Seriously, the Apple fanboy talking points get old after a while. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-samsung-galaxy-note-shown-in-leaked-photos-01205298/#comment-168228</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 05:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=205298#comment-168228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a huge Exynos fan, recently replaced my I9100 with a Galaxy Note, and I also own a Tab 8.9 LTE with the same Snapdragon as your Skyrocket.  

The resolution is the same on both devices, and the Snapdragon is not *that* far behind the Exynos at stock clocks in real world usage.  And the LTE Tab can OC up to 1.94GHz, handily outperforming the Note at stock 1.4GHz.  

Of course, the Note can overclock to 1.7GHz, taking the lead again, but I digress.  :)

TL;DR: Despite Michael Ma&#039;s hatred, the MSM8660 doesn&#039;t totally suck compared to Exynos, synthetic benchmarks don&#039;t tell the whole story, and the LTE modem support from Qualcomm could be worth a little hit to processing prowess.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a huge Exynos fan, recently replaced my I9100 with a Galaxy Note, and I also own a Tab 8.9 LTE with the same Snapdragon as your Skyrocket.  </p>
<p>The resolution is the same on both devices, and the Snapdragon is not *that* far behind the Exynos at stock clocks in real world usage.  And the LTE Tab can OC up to 1.94GHz, handily outperforming the Note at stock 1.4GHz.  </p>
<p>Of course, the Note can overclock to 1.7GHz, taking the lead again, but I digress.  :)</p>
<p>TL;DR: Despite Michael Ma&#8217;s hatred, the MSM8660 doesn&#8217;t totally suck compared to Exynos, synthetic benchmarks don&#8217;t tell the whole story, and the LTE modem support from Qualcomm could be worth a little hit to processing prowess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-samsung-galaxy-note-shown-in-leaked-photos-01205298/#comment-168203</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 01:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=205298#comment-168203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Honey, no offense but before the iPhone existed, i owned a Samsung phone, touch screen, the thinnest phone at that time and gasp... it looked like an iPhone except go back to the first part of my sentence.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honey, no offense but before the iPhone existed, i owned a Samsung phone, touch screen, the thinnest phone at that time and gasp&#8230; it looked like an iPhone except go back to the first part of my sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-samsung-galaxy-note-shown-in-leaked-photos-01205298/#comment-168198</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 00:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=205298#comment-168198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I prefer no logo at all.  Hmmm, only one brand of devices I can think of where that&#039;s possible, regardless of carrier :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer no logo at all.  Hmmm, only one brand of devices I can think of where that&#8217;s possible, regardless of carrier :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tmb993</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-samsung-galaxy-note-shown-in-leaked-photos-01205298/#comment-168160</link>
		<dc:creator>tmb993</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 22:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=205298#comment-168160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where would you rather have it? Verizon? Ha, Have fun trying to find reliable 4G coverage.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where would you rather have it? Verizon? Ha, Have fun trying to find reliable 4G coverage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Tucker</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-samsung-galaxy-note-shown-in-leaked-photos-01205298/#comment-168111</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Tucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=205298#comment-168111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Truth is At&amp;t does not have a compatible Exynos processor that can support LTE. That is why the skyrocket has a Qualcomm chip set. The current Exynos processor does not support LTE. The Exynos processor in the original Galaxy Note does support LTE speeds, but not in America. Remember, each carrier works off a different frequency or spectrum. At&amp;T works between 700MHz and 750 MHz. What they do outside of America is something different. So, I hoping that this device will pack at least 1.7GHz Dual core processor.  But I have a bad feeling about this.  The 1.4 GHz dual core Exynos processors surpass in benchmark scores the 1.2 GHz Dual core Exynos processor, which in turn surpass the 1.5GHZ Qualcomm in benchmark scores on average of 600pts or greater. Something to do with 28nm to 32nm ratio. I want it, BAD! But if they dumb this phone down, I will just wait for the Samsung Galaxy SIII in the fall. Why would you dumb down a phone 1200 points lower than its international counter part and expect it to perform the same? There better be some serious engineering going on if they do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Truth is At&amp;t does not have a compatible Exynos processor that can support LTE. That is why the skyrocket has a Qualcomm chip set. The current Exynos processor does not support LTE. The Exynos processor in the original Galaxy Note does support LTE speeds, but not in America. Remember, each carrier works off a different frequency or spectrum. At&amp;T works between 700MHz and 750 MHz. What they do outside of America is something different. So, I hoping that this device will pack at least 1.7GHz Dual core processor.  But I have a bad feeling about this.  The 1.4 GHz dual core Exynos processors surpass in benchmark scores the 1.2 GHz Dual core Exynos processor, which in turn surpass the 1.5GHZ Qualcomm in benchmark scores on average of 600pts or greater. Something to do with 28nm to 32nm ratio. I want it, BAD! But if they dumb this phone down, I will just wait for the Samsung Galaxy SIII in the fall. Why would you dumb down a phone 1200 points lower than its international counter part and expect it to perform the same? There better be some serious engineering going on if they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-samsung-galaxy-note-shown-in-leaked-photos-01205298/#comment-168071</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=205298#comment-168071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not just that; the software buttons will at times freeze up for a second or two when an app locks up. Most of the times that happens, the physical home button will still work and you can go back to the home, where everything else works, or get to the task killer and exit the app. 

Also, there is no doubt where the buttons are: big physical button is home, to the left is menu, and to the right is back. We don&#039;t need a search button anyway, you can hold the menu button from navigation screens.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not just that; the software buttons will at times freeze up for a second or two when an app locks up. Most of the times that happens, the physical home button will still work and you can go back to the home, where everything else works, or get to the task killer and exit the app. </p>
<p>Also, there is no doubt where the buttons are: big physical button is home, to the left is menu, and to the right is back. We don&#8217;t need a search button anyway, you can hold the menu button from navigation screens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-samsung-galaxy-note-shown-in-leaked-photos-01205298/#comment-168066</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=205298#comment-168066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Son of a bitch! Leave the fucking physical home button alone!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Son of a bitch! Leave the fucking physical home button alone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catiecat15</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-samsung-galaxy-note-shown-in-leaked-photos-01205298/#comment-168062</link>
		<dc:creator>Catiecat15</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 17:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=205298#comment-168062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really hope this comes through soon! My Captivate is almost dead. Honestly I would really just like to use my 7&quot; Galaxy Tab as a phone, but I am not savvy enough to flash it :(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really hope this comes through soon! My Captivate is almost dead. Honestly I would really just like to use my 7&#8243; Galaxy Tab as a phone, but I am not savvy enough to flash it :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria Fe Camaya O'Neill</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-samsung-galaxy-note-shown-in-leaked-photos-01205298/#comment-168057</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria Fe Camaya O'Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 17:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=205298#comment-168057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know there will be some who really want this device but i just don&#039;t get it. If your going to be using a stylist wouldn&#039;t you want something bigger? and if you want a phone wouldn&#039;t something smaller be better? Saves you from carrying two devices i guess but the one you&#039;re carrying isn&#039;t suited well for either purpose.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know there will be some who really want this device but i just don&#8217;t get it. If your going to be using a stylist wouldn&#8217;t you want something bigger? and if you want a phone wouldn&#8217;t something smaller be better? Saves you from carrying two devices i guess but the one you&#8217;re carrying isn&#8217;t suited well for either purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dograw</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-samsung-galaxy-note-shown-in-leaked-photos-01205298/#comment-168042</link>
		<dc:creator>Dograw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=205298#comment-168042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I talked with a Best Buy employee on Saturday about this phone. He searched the BB system, It said it was in shipping status.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I talked with a Best Buy employee on Saturday about this phone. He searched the BB system, It said it was in shipping status.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-samsung-galaxy-note-shown-in-leaked-photos-01205298/#comment-167989</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 11:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=205298#comment-167989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi huge Apple Fan. I love Apple products also, but I dislike the Apple OS. Notes from Apple might be slightly true but a lot of the features are down right common sense. You have to look also at the Android OS was being developed in 2005 for sure and most likely before that. Maybe Apple stole they idea from Android Inc and was able to speedy the development because they had more cashflow. No one knows????]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi huge Apple Fan. I love Apple products also, but I dislike the Apple OS. Notes from Apple might be slightly true but a lot of the features are down right common sense. You have to look also at the Android OS was being developed in 2005 for sure and most likely before that. Maybe Apple stole they idea from Android Inc and was able to speedy the development because they had more cashflow. No one knows????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matti</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-samsung-galaxy-note-shown-in-leaked-photos-01205298/#comment-167986</link>
		<dc:creator>Matti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 11:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=205298#comment-167986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Sammo Hung of smartphones!! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Sammo Hung of smartphones!! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hey</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-samsung-galaxy-note-shown-in-leaked-photos-01205298/#comment-167981</link>
		<dc:creator>Hey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 10:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=205298#comment-167981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[this or galaxy nexus, which ever comes to att first ill get. let the race begin!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this or galaxy nexus, which ever comes to att first ill get. let the race begin!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theskylarksmith</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-samsung-galaxy-note-shown-in-leaked-photos-01205298/#comment-167976</link>
		<dc:creator>Theskylarksmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 09:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=205298#comment-167976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are what you hate. Being so eager to  call out Apple fan boys and dismiss appreciation for Apple products as being &quot;Koolaid&quot; is just as irrational and sweeping as you criticise your target as being. &quot;I&#039;m going against the grain because I want to be defined as being different&quot;. You and the other half of the world. Your packs are the same, even their genesis. You&#039;ve just changed the flaver of that Koolaid, barely, and took a big gulp. Enjoy!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are what you hate. Being so eager to  call out Apple fan boys and dismiss appreciation for Apple products as being &#8220;Koolaid&#8221; is just as irrational and sweeping as you criticise your target as being. &#8220;I&#8217;m going against the grain because I want to be defined as being different&#8221;. You and the other half of the world. Your packs are the same, even their genesis. You&#8217;ve just changed the flaver of that Koolaid, barely, and took a big gulp. Enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Ma</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-samsung-galaxy-note-shown-in-leaked-photos-01205298/#comment-167972</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 08:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=205298#comment-167972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The AT&amp;T Samsung Galaxy Note LTE was dead before arrival when it was revealed it had the same slow dual 1.5ghz Snapdragon processor that exists on my Galaxy SII Skyrocket.  I want to throw up every time I see a Snapdragon ad, praising it as some kind of a revolution.  Seriously, this processor is just barely holding its own on a 800 x 480 screen on Gingerbread (after all the rooting to get rid of bloatware, and hacks to compensate for video overlay choppiness).  You don&#039;t want this processor on any higher resolutions.  I think AT&amp;T is going to have a real challenge to make lemonade with a lump of coal known as APQ8060]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The AT&amp;T Samsung Galaxy Note LTE was dead before arrival when it was revealed it had the same slow dual 1.5ghz Snapdragon processor that exists on my Galaxy SII Skyrocket.  I want to throw up every time I see a Snapdragon ad, praising it as some kind of a revolution.  Seriously, this processor is just barely holding its own on a 800 x 480 screen on Gingerbread (after all the rooting to get rid of bloatware, and hacks to compensate for video overlay choppiness).  You don&#8217;t want this processor on any higher resolutions.  I think AT&amp;T is going to have a real challenge to make lemonade with a lump of coal known as APQ8060</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-samsung-galaxy-note-shown-in-leaked-photos-01205298/#comment-167968</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 08:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=205298#comment-167968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another rabid Apple fanboy regurgitating fanboy talking points. Too bad Apple&#039;s lawsuits against Samsung have been deemed frivolous all around the world. 


Keep drinking that Koolaid, and I hope that obsolete iPhone is serving you well. Wonder what new features they&#039;ll bring to it. I know--4G and a bigger screen!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another rabid Apple fanboy regurgitating fanboy talking points. Too bad Apple&#8217;s lawsuits against Samsung have been deemed frivolous all around the world. </p>
<p>Keep drinking that Koolaid, and I hope that obsolete iPhone is serving you well. Wonder what new features they&#8217;ll bring to it. I know&#8211;4G and a bigger screen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: highlander</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-samsung-galaxy-note-shown-in-leaked-photos-01205298/#comment-167964</link>
		<dc:creator>highlander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 07:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=205298#comment-167964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the record, I am an iPhone4 owner, because at the time of purchase, it was the best option in my opinion. My next phone won&#039;t be an iPhone, as other better options have emerged, after doing my homework. Yes, I&#039;m not a fan of any brands or companies, but a fan of choice and quality. It&#039;s sad to see some of the iFans so willing to be manipulated by the marketing ploys of the company, and proudly surrender their choice and rationality.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, I am an iPhone4 owner, because at the time of purchase, it was the best option in my opinion. My next phone won&#8217;t be an iPhone, as other better options have emerged, after doing my homework. Yes, I&#8217;m not a fan of any brands or companies, but a fan of choice and quality. It&#8217;s sad to see some of the iFans so willing to be manipulated by the marketing ploys of the company, and proudly surrender their choice and rationality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Sequeira</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-samsung-galaxy-note-shown-in-leaked-photos-01205298/#comment-167963</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Sequeira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 06:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=205298#comment-167963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good one! I prefer my Android phone to the iPhone that I replaced recently. Why? Because of the fact that Apple restricts a lot of applications on their App Store. With all this non-sense that Apple is doing suing Motorola, Samsung, and HTC because of the design is all rubbish. It is like Toyota suing Honda because they took some design cues from the Prius in order to make an equivalent Insight.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good one! I prefer my Android phone to the iPhone that I replaced recently. Why? Because of the fact that Apple restricts a lot of applications on their App Store. With all this non-sense that Apple is doing suing Motorola, Samsung, and HTC because of the design is all rubbish. It is like Toyota suing Honda because they took some design cues from the Prius in order to make an equivalent Insight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: highlander</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-samsung-galaxy-note-shown-in-leaked-photos-01205298/#comment-167961</link>
		<dc:creator>highlander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 06:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=205298#comment-167961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just because iPhone is rectangular with rounded edges, all other phones with similar appearance must be copy cats of iPhone. What a typical uneducated Apple mentality! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because iPhone is rectangular with rounded edges, all other phones with similar appearance must be copy cats of iPhone. What a typical uneducated Apple mentality! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorie Heartley</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-samsung-galaxy-note-shown-in-leaked-photos-01205298/#comment-167960</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorie Heartley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 06:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=205298#comment-167960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m getting more and more bored with all these iPhone-ish phones. No matter how much they change the phone&#039;s appearance, you can&#039;t erase the fact that they all got notes from iPhone. And, yes, I am a huge Apple products fan.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m getting more and more bored with all these iPhone-ish phones. No matter how much they change the phone&#8217;s appearance, you can&#8217;t erase the fact that they all got notes from iPhone. And, yes, I am a huge Apple products fan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricardo G.</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-samsung-galaxy-note-shown-in-leaked-photos-01205298/#comment-167959</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricardo G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 06:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=205298#comment-167959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SOLD!!! CAN&quot;T WAIT!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SOLD!!! CAN&#8221;T WAIT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-samsung-galaxy-note-shown-in-leaked-photos-01205298/#comment-167958</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 06:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=205298#comment-167958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wish Verizon was getting this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish Verizon was getting this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Stansberry</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-samsung-galaxy-note-shown-in-leaked-photos-01205298/#comment-167957</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Stansberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 05:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=205298#comment-167957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pity to get rid of the one lonely physical home button that is on the front of the foreign version.  I actually like the option of waking up the device that way.  I find the tiny power switch on the side of Sammy phones a pain to search for.  You also have to wonder if they&#039;ll allow Wallet to work, or block it like VZW did on the Galaxy Nexus.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pity to get rid of the one lonely physical home button that is on the front of the foreign version.  I actually like the option of waking up the device that way.  I find the tiny power switch on the side of Sammy phones a pain to search for.  You also have to wonder if they&#8217;ll allow Wallet to work, or block it like VZW did on the Galaxy Nexus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Hiley</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-samsung-galaxy-note-shown-in-leaked-photos-01205298/#comment-167953</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Hiley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 04:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=205298#comment-167953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sweet Device....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet Device&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-samsung-galaxy-note-shown-in-leaked-photos-01205298/#comment-167948</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 04:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=205298#comment-167948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A big AT&amp;T logo on the front... eeew]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A big AT&amp;T logo on the front&#8230; eeew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
