<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T HTC One X screams through benchmarks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/att-htc-one-x-screams-through-benchmarks-26219991/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-htc-one-x-screams-through-benchmarks-26219991/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 02:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabio Sousa</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-htc-one-x-screams-through-benchmarks-26219991/#comment-198787</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Sousa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 21:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=219991#comment-198787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not happy that here in Europe we are not getting  Dual Core for X  model. This will force me to get the One S instead. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not happy that here in Europe we are not getting  Dual Core for X  model. This will force me to get the One S instead. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabio Sousa</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-htc-one-x-screams-through-benchmarks-26219991/#comment-198786</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Sousa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 21:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=219991#comment-198786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Simple! Because the Dual Core (Third Generation - Likewise more mature technology) has better performance per core and is most likely, in terms of build costs, to be more expensive than the  Quad Core (First Generation). So HTC had to re-balance their profits... deciding to cut on disk capacity. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simple! Because the Dual Core (Third Generation &#8211; Likewise more mature technology) has better performance per core and is most likely, in terms of build costs, to be more expensive than the  Quad Core (First Generation). So HTC had to re-balance their profits&#8230; deciding to cut on disk capacity. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-htc-one-x-screams-through-benchmarks-26219991/#comment-196948</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=219991#comment-196948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But they&#039;re giving 25GB&#039;s of storage for free from dropbox for 2 years. So you could store ROM data and random information in the cloud leaving the 16GB&#039;s for music or whatever you decide. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But they&#8217;re giving 25GB&#8217;s of storage for free from dropbox for 2 years. So you could store ROM data and random information in the cloud leaving the 16GB&#8217;s for music or whatever you decide. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenshindc</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-htc-one-x-screams-through-benchmarks-26219991/#comment-196836</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenshindc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 14:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=219991#comment-196836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Probably so they can sell the phone at $199 price point. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably so they can sell the phone at $199 price point. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bethea</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-htc-one-x-screams-through-benchmarks-26219991/#comment-196835</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bethea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 14:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=219991#comment-196835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Man This phone looks better and better everyday, but im not sure if i can get past the 16gb storge. I wish the Galaxy S3 would be announced already.

is there really no micro SD slot?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man This phone looks better and better everyday, but im not sure if i can get past the 16gb storge. I wish the Galaxy S3 would be announced already.</p>
<p>is there really no micro SD slot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ritesh Tripathy</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/att-htc-one-x-screams-through-benchmarks-26219991/#comment-196821</link>
		<dc:creator>Ritesh Tripathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=219991#comment-196821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If anything&#039;s going to fail this version of the One X, its the 16GB non-expandable storage. Why did they chop it when the intl version has 32 GB?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anything&#8217;s going to fail this version of the One X, its the 16GB non-expandable storage. Why did they chop it when the intl version has 32 GB?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
