<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Art.Lebedev not ending the Optimus line with its current production keyboard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/artlebedev-not-ending-the-optimus-line-with-its-current-production-keyboard-1810794/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/artlebedev-not-ending-the-optimus-line-with-its-current-production-keyboard-1810794/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 01:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orclev</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/artlebedev-not-ending-the-optimus-line-with-its-current-production-keyboard-1810794/#comment-38321</link>
		<dc:creator>Orclev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 18:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/artlebedev-not-ending-the-optimus-line-with-its-current-production-keyboard-1810794.php#comment-38321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know, the e-ink idea actually sounds like a good idea to me, the only challenge will be getting it lit well enough to see in the dark. For something like a keyboard that isn&#039;t likely to change all that often, particularly a wireless model that&#039;s going to be on a energy constraint to begin with, e-ink actually sounds like the perfect solution. True you lose the animations, and the colors on current generation e-ink are more or less restricted to grayscale, but all told a re-programmable wireless keyboard with good battery life seems a fair trade for that.

As for the giant touch screen keyboard, I don&#039;t like that idea. With something like a keyboard the tactile feedback is really necessary and anything that doesn&#039;t provide that is going to be really rough to use. It&#039;s ok for something like the iPhone because your always looking at it when you use it, and you don&#039;t actually do much typing on it anyway, but for a keyboard where you&#039;re going to be watching the screen all the time, it&#039;s practically the kiss of death.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know, the e-ink idea actually sounds like a good idea to me, the only challenge will be getting it lit well enough to see in the dark. For something like a keyboard that isn&#8217;t likely to change all that often, particularly a wireless model that&#8217;s going to be on a energy constraint to begin with, e-ink actually sounds like the perfect solution. True you lose the animations, and the colors on current generation e-ink are more or less restricted to grayscale, but all told a re-programmable wireless keyboard with good battery life seems a fair trade for that.</p>
<p>As for the giant touch screen keyboard, I don&#8217;t like that idea. With something like a keyboard the tactile feedback is really necessary and anything that doesn&#8217;t provide that is going to be really rough to use. It&#8217;s ok for something like the iPhone because your always looking at it when you use it, and you don&#8217;t actually do much typing on it anyway, but for a keyboard where you&#8217;re going to be watching the screen all the time, it&#8217;s practically the kiss of death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
