Comments on: Arm Flycatcher chips aim for “years” of battery time http://www.slashgear.com/arm-flycatcher-chips-aim-for-years-of-battery-time-13218189/ Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions Thu, 17 May 2012 17:46:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Phynce http://www.slashgear.com/arm-flycatcher-chips-aim-for-years-of-battery-time-13218189/#comment-193571 Phynce Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:18:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=218189#comment-193571 If we use less the price will go up economics 101. So in the end we get less for more.

]]> By: Phynce http://www.slashgear.com/arm-flycatcher-chips-aim-for-years-of-battery-time-13218189/#comment-193572 Phynce Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:18:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=218189#comment-193572 If we use less the price will go up economics 101. So in the end we get less for more.

]]> By: IAgree http://www.slashgear.com/arm-flycatcher-chips-aim-for-years-of-battery-time-13218189/#comment-193508 IAgree Wed, 14 Mar 2012 04:54:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=218189#comment-193508 Amen…And that problem, of not proofreading sufficiently, is everywhere. There is NO excuse for it.

]]> By: JayE http://www.slashgear.com/arm-flycatcher-chips-aim-for-years-of-battery-time-13218189/#comment-193413 JayE Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:59:00 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/?p=218189#comment-193413 Just about the sloppiest writing I have ever seen online, and that says a lot.  Doesn’t anyone bother to read this crap before posting it?

]]>