<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple&#8217;s new Apple TV A5 chip is 41% smaller than previous A5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/apples-new-apple-tv-a5-chip-is-41-smaller-than-previous-a5-11222567/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apples-new-apple-tv-a5-chip-is-41-smaller-than-previous-a5-11222567/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 18:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnh24</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apples-new-apple-tv-a5-chip-is-41-smaller-than-previous-a5-11222567/#comment-202165</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnh24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 01:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=222567#comment-202165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Samsung makes it, not apple.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samsung makes it, not apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eleeflyguy43</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apples-new-apple-tv-a5-chip-is-41-smaller-than-previous-a5-11222567/#comment-201911</link>
		<dc:creator>Eleeflyguy43</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=222567#comment-201911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[supply chain cost down measures working hand in hand with the Apple product develoment team to increase functionality and features while lowering cost.  it is just good business]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>supply chain cost down measures working hand in hand with the Apple product develoment team to increase functionality and features while lowering cost.  it is just good business</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnJohnJ</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apples-new-apple-tv-a5-chip-is-41-smaller-than-previous-a5-11222567/#comment-201876</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnJohnJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 04:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=222567#comment-201876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Author, you write &quot;...These are factors that would significantly lower Apple’s manufacturing cost...&quot; Why? Are you sure?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author, you write &#8220;&#8230;These are factors that would significantly lower Apple’s manufacturing cost&#8230;&#8221; Why? Are you sure?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randy cowles</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apples-new-apple-tv-a5-chip-is-41-smaller-than-previous-a5-11222567/#comment-201873</link>
		<dc:creator>randy cowles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 04:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=222567#comment-201873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[cool, but is it still useless?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cool, but is it still useless?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
