<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Safari 4 launched: 30x faster JavaScript than IE7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/apple-safari-4-launched-30x-faster-javascript-than-ie7-2435562/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-safari-4-launched-30x-faster-javascript-than-ie7-2435562/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 12:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: marssun</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-safari-4-launched-30x-faster-javascript-than-ie7-2435562/#comment-58557</link>
		<dc:creator>marssun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=35562#comment-58557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s nice, but what it means is that all along FireFox Javascrip has been faster than safari.  And quicker on a pc for obvious reasons.  This is probably why apple needed to revamp the code.  But now how long will it take ifans to start with the &quot;they made it faster first&quot; b.s., lol.  But they probably wouldn&#039;t dare because it would be met with a lot of criticism since many other things were faster on pc&#039;s first and so on.  And it&#039;s not like it&#039;s a huge deal anyway because it&#039;s just for javascript and will only enhance a handful of applications.  Don&#039;t get me wrong. It&#039;s very cool to make the java engine more efficient, but it is what it is.  It&#039;s not like loading html pages got the boost and things do tend to be limited by bandwidth on most things.  youtube will be the same etc etc. I expect firefox and to probably do an update eventually.  As for ie7, that&#039;s pretty much ancient.  People would be more interested in IE8 and the new browser for Windows 7 which was out before Safari 4.  But at the moment, I&#039;m sure ifans will be pleased with what ever javascript runs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s nice, but what it means is that all along FireFox Javascrip has been faster than safari.  And quicker on a pc for obvious reasons.  This is probably why apple needed to revamp the code.  But now how long will it take ifans to start with the &#8220;they made it faster first&#8221; b.s., lol.  But they probably wouldn&#8217;t dare because it would be met with a lot of criticism since many other things were faster on pc&#8217;s first and so on.  And it&#8217;s not like it&#8217;s a huge deal anyway because it&#8217;s just for javascript and will only enhance a handful of applications.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong. It&#8217;s very cool to make the java engine more efficient, but it is what it is.  It&#8217;s not like loading html pages got the boost and things do tend to be limited by bandwidth on most things.  youtube will be the same etc etc. I expect firefox and to probably do an update eventually.  As for ie7, that&#8217;s pretty much ancient.  People would be more interested in IE8 and the new browser for Windows 7 which was out before Safari 4.  But at the moment, I&#8217;m sure ifans will be pleased with what ever javascript runs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john00john</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-safari-4-launched-30x-faster-javascript-than-ie7-2435562/#comment-58553</link>
		<dc:creator>john00john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=35562#comment-58553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m really enjoying Safari 4, but it will take some real getting used to/convincing in terms of the new tab location.
a good &quot;first look video&quot; for Safari 4:
http://www.woopid.com/video/2308/Safari-4-First-Look]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really enjoying Safari 4, but it will take some real getting used to/convincing in terms of the new tab location.<br />
a good &#8220;first look video&#8221; for Safari 4:<br />
<a href="http://www.woopid.com/video/2308/Safari-4-First-Look" rel="nofollow">http://www.woopid.com/video/2308/Safari-4-First-Look</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
