<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple research admits Samsung no threat leaks redacted ruling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/apple-research-admits-samsung-no-threat-leaks-redacted-ruling-06200219/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-research-admits-samsung-no-threat-leaks-redacted-ruling-06200219/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 06:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Flynn</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-research-admits-samsung-no-threat-leaks-redacted-ruling-06200219/#comment-161962</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Flynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 11:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=200219#comment-161962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Talk about self incrimination, huh Apple!!! Bummer, eh!

Samsung you lucky bastards! ha ha! Now give my Galaxy S 2 some Ice Cream Sandwhich to celebrate with this holidays victory! Now,mates!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talk about self incrimination, huh Apple!!! Bummer, eh!</p>
<p>Samsung you lucky bastards! ha ha! Now give my Galaxy S 2 some Ice Cream Sandwhich to celebrate with this holidays victory! Now,mates!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Android owner</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-research-admits-samsung-no-threat-leaks-redacted-ruling-06200219/#comment-161334</link>
		<dc:creator>Android owner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 21:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=200219#comment-161334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As far as I understand it you have to defend patents/Trademarks or you loose them. Right now Chick Fil A is suing a Kale company for using &quot;Eat more kale&quot; as which is similar to their TM &quot;Eat more Chicken&quot;. If they didn&#039;t it would open the doors for Wendy&#039;s or Burger King to use &quot;Eat more beef&quot; I know these are not really the same thing but still blame retarded Patent/Trademark Laws]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I understand it you have to defend patents/Trademarks or you loose them. Right now Chick Fil A is suing a Kale company for using &#8220;Eat more kale&#8221; as which is similar to their TM &#8220;Eat more Chicken&#8221;. If they didn&#8217;t it would open the doors for Wendy&#8217;s or Burger King to use &#8220;Eat more beef&#8221; I know these are not really the same thing but still blame retarded Patent/Trademark Laws</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Mathews</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-research-admits-samsung-no-threat-leaks-redacted-ruling-06200219/#comment-161030</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Mathews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 05:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=200219#comment-161030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve never wanted to be associated with the apple fans. Now I don&#039;t even want to be associated with apple. 

Good job Apple. You&#039;re as bad as your fans.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never wanted to be associated with the apple fans. Now I don&#8217;t even want to be associated with apple. </p>
<p>Good job Apple. You&#8217;re as bad as your fans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soricon</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-research-admits-samsung-no-threat-leaks-redacted-ruling-06200219/#comment-160420</link>
		<dc:creator>soricon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 22:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=200219#comment-160420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...including making tablets that were non-rectangular and that had busy, confusing interfaces
Are you saying that a patent covering a rectangular tablet is really valid??? WOW!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;including making tablets that were non-rectangular and that had busy, confusing interfaces<br />
Are you saying that a patent covering a rectangular tablet is really valid??? WOW!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-research-admits-samsung-no-threat-leaks-redacted-ruling-06200219/#comment-160357</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 19:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=200219#comment-160357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There should be a financial penalty to Apple for this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There should be a financial penalty to Apple for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maxx</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-research-admits-samsung-no-threat-leaks-redacted-ruling-06200219/#comment-160352</link>
		<dc:creator>Maxx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 19:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=200219#comment-160352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple.. you made me sick to my stomach. I don&#039;t think I will ever buy your iPhone or Ipod ever. Samsung I&#039;ll buy your phone :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple.. you made me sick to my stomach. I don&#8217;t think I will ever buy your iPhone or Ipod ever. Samsung I&#8217;ll buy your phone :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark42</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-research-admits-samsung-no-threat-leaks-redacted-ruling-06200219/#comment-160148</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 13:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=200219#comment-160148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple should be made to pay very heavily for this. Their tactic all along was, if they couldnt ban the Samsung prodocts outright, theyd at least stall for time whilst these hearings went through, thus killing the tabs before they even saw the light of day. The Galaxy tabs are a nice Tablet, but with the advent of the Tegra 3 quadcores already coming on stream, The current tabs are already dead in the water.

Samsung do have the tenacity and resources to build new and improved devices very quickly, so they will bounce back, but this was a deliberate ploy by Apple, to slow them down.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple should be made to pay very heavily for this. Their tactic all along was, if they couldnt ban the Samsung prodocts outright, theyd at least stall for time whilst these hearings went through, thus killing the tabs before they even saw the light of day. The Galaxy tabs are a nice Tablet, but with the advent of the Tegra 3 quadcores already coming on stream, The current tabs are already dead in the water.</p>
<p>Samsung do have the tenacity and resources to build new and improved devices very quickly, so they will bounce back, but this was a deliberate ploy by Apple, to slow them down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timbox100</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-research-admits-samsung-no-threat-leaks-redacted-ruling-06200219/#comment-160117</link>
		<dc:creator>timbox100</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 11:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=200219#comment-160117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What? Apple has finally admitted what every one knew!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What? Apple has finally admitted what every one knew!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
