<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple patent delivers refined curved glass</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/apple-patent-delivers-refined-curved-glass-26262149/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-patent-delivers-refined-curved-glass-26262149/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jbatch</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-patent-delivers-refined-curved-glass-26262149/#comment-263026</link>
		<dc:creator>jbatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 21:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=262149#comment-263026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nokia n9 curve glass]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nokia n9 curve glass</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thereasoner</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-patent-delivers-refined-curved-glass-26262149/#comment-263009</link>
		<dc:creator>thereasoner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 20:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=262149#comment-263009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This looks like glass for the front of a smart phone just like on my 2+ year old Nexus S. What is it with this companies obsession with getting patents on ideas that clearly don&#039;t belong to them? Much like patents recently used in court against Samsung, this will also be invalidated by the USPTO when push comes to shove! Which begs the question, why even bother to go after such useless patents in the first place? Is it all about the propaganda now for Apple? Has fooling the consumer taken priority over product development at Apple HQ&#039;s ? It certainly looks that way!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks like glass for the front of a smart phone just like on my 2+ year old Nexus S. What is it with this companies obsession with getting patents on ideas that clearly don&#8217;t belong to them? Much like patents recently used in court against Samsung, this will also be invalidated by the USPTO when push comes to shove! Which begs the question, why even bother to go after such useless patents in the first place? Is it all about the propaganda now for Apple? Has fooling the consumer taken priority over product development at Apple HQ&#8217;s ? It certainly looks that way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-patent-delivers-refined-curved-glass-26262149/#comment-263002</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 18:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=262149#comment-263002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, yay!
More glass that consumers can shatter by accident and for Apple to make a fortune out of repairs and replacements.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, yay!<br />
More glass that consumers can shatter by accident and for Apple to make a fortune out of repairs and replacements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Good ol' JS</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-patent-delivers-refined-curved-glass-26262149/#comment-263001</link>
		<dc:creator>Good ol' JS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=262149#comment-263001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Apple.  
  F You
    Love Samsung]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Apple.<br />
  F You<br />
    Love Samsung</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MediaCritiquer.com</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-patent-delivers-refined-curved-glass-26262149/#comment-262994</link>
		<dc:creator>MediaCritiquer.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 17:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=262149#comment-262994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple now has patent options...so they&#039;ve patented future tech that has yet to be invented.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple now has patent options&#8230;so they&#8217;ve patented future tech that has yet to be invented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MediaCritiquer.com</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-patent-delivers-refined-curved-glass-26262149/#comment-262992</link>
		<dc:creator>MediaCritiquer.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 17:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=262149#comment-262992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you serious?  Curved glass?  This is at least a generation old via Samsung&#039; Galaxy Nexus.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you serious?  Curved glass?  This is at least a generation old via Samsung&#8217; Galaxy Nexus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roebling</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-patent-delivers-refined-curved-glass-26262149/#comment-262986</link>
		<dc:creator>roebling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 17:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=262149#comment-262986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Uh oh. Apple will be suing Samsung for the concave glass on my Galaxy Nexus, no doubt.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh oh. Apple will be suing Samsung for the concave glass on my Galaxy Nexus, no doubt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
