<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple iPad used to help a man cross the US border</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/apple-ipad-used-to-help-a-man-cross-the-us-border-04206148/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-ipad-used-to-help-a-man-cross-the-us-border-04206148/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 01:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne McKenzie</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-ipad-used-to-help-a-man-cross-the-us-border-04206148/#comment-169061</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne McKenzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 14:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=206148#comment-169061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As long as something some document, whether physical or digital, is the standard for identification forgery will be possible. It&#039;s just a question of how convincingly it is accomplished. I propose that there be two lines for identity checking at airports, borders and other supposedly secure locations: one for people using whatever passes for ID at that location (passport, driver&#039;s license, etc.) and one line for those of us who voluntarily have our retinal scans entered into a global database. Included in the process of entry into the DB would be a rigorous vetting that would determine that you have no nefarious intentions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as something some document, whether physical or digital, is the standard for identification forgery will be possible. It&#8217;s just a question of how convincingly it is accomplished. I propose that there be two lines for identity checking at airports, borders and other supposedly secure locations: one for people using whatever passes for ID at that location (passport, driver&#8217;s license, etc.) and one line for those of us who voluntarily have our retinal scans entered into a global database. Included in the process of entry into the DB would be a rigorous vetting that would determine that you have no nefarious intentions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Counsel Dew</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-ipad-used-to-help-a-man-cross-the-us-border-04206148/#comment-169011</link>
		<dc:creator>Counsel Dew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 11:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=206148#comment-169011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I sent in a link... yet a search of his name and drivers license serves up a reference...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sent in a link&#8230; yet a search of his name and drivers license serves up a reference&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wiz</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-ipad-used-to-help-a-man-cross-the-us-border-04206148/#comment-168977</link>
		<dc:creator>wiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 08:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=206148#comment-168977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a great ad, thank you guys! It&#039;s great to read these &#039;news&#039; everyday! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a great ad, thank you guys! It&#8217;s great to read these &#8216;news&#8217; everyday! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ujand-Psy</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-ipad-used-to-help-a-man-cross-the-us-border-04206148/#comment-168956</link>
		<dc:creator>ujand-Psy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 05:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=206148#comment-168956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[do you mind to share the source where it said Reish  driver license got him through the border? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>do you mind to share the source where it said Reish  driver license got him through the border? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Stashuk</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/apple-ipad-used-to-help-a-man-cross-the-us-border-04206148/#comment-168954</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Stashuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 05:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=206148#comment-168954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[this story is total scam started by a reporter yesterday which has 
spread around the world now. Reish didn&#039;t contact the media, didn&#039;t 
think nor claim he believed it was the iPad which got him through, some 
journalist invented that part, and now on its second day, youtube has 
videos showing him getting through the border by waving an iPad, Globe 
and Mail is running headlines saying &#039;Man gets through border with wave 
on an iPad&#039;, and Martin Reich is getting crucfied as a media hound.

In
 500 stories on google I can&#039;t find a single reference to Reisht 
contacting the media nor a single quote where he says he thinks it is 
the iPad which got him through (it was his drivers license). The whole 
iPad angle is contrived, and not necessarily by Riesh. This site now says &#039;the border officer scanned the iPad&#039; which he didn&#039;t and was never reported...The thing just keeps getting more twisted LOL. 

This is the single biggest scam in reporting I&#039;ve seen in a while, and I hope some people start asking questions. The story is, a guy forgot his passport but had his drivers license, which the border officer accepted. That&#039;s it. I really hope they crucify the original reporter or at least clear up who the heck started the story. For all we know a reported picked it up off of a casual blog or something, and why would Reish - who DID NOT THINK THE IPAD was what GOT HIM THROUGH, call the media about what he thought was a non-story. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this story is total scam started by a reporter yesterday which has<br />
spread around the world now. Reish didn&#8217;t contact the media, didn&#8217;t<br />
think nor claim he believed it was the iPad which got him through, some<br />
journalist invented that part, and now on its second day, youtube has<br />
videos showing him getting through the border by waving an iPad, Globe<br />
and Mail is running headlines saying &#8216;Man gets through border with wave<br />
on an iPad&#8217;, and Martin Reich is getting crucfied as a media hound.</p>
<p>In<br />
 500 stories on google I can&#8217;t find a single reference to Reisht<br />
contacting the media nor a single quote where he says he thinks it is<br />
the iPad which got him through (it was his drivers license). The whole<br />
iPad angle is contrived, and not necessarily by Riesh. This site now says &#8216;the border officer scanned the iPad&#8217; which he didn&#8217;t and was never reported&#8230;The thing just keeps getting more twisted LOL. </p>
<p>This is the single biggest scam in reporting I&#8217;ve seen in a while, and I hope some people start asking questions. The story is, a guy forgot his passport but had his drivers license, which the border officer accepted. That&#8217;s it. I really hope they crucify the original reporter or at least clear up who the heck started the story. For all we know a reported picked it up off of a casual blog or something, and why would Reish &#8211; who DID NOT THINK THE IPAD was what GOT HIM THROUGH, call the media about what he thought was a non-story. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
