The tegra3 is a pathetic chip.  Why does that bother you Fandroids so much?  Because you bought into an INFERIOR platform with an underperforming chip?  Just accept reality.  The sooner you face reality, the better off you’ll be Fandroids.

Try actually googling the benchmarks.  They’re done by Anandtech.  A5X is MUCH faster with 6X the fill rate. 

Sorry Fandroid, you lose again.

You know, you should actually take your own advice and look things up before you make a total fool out of yourself.

And the A5X is already known to be 45nm.

A5X and Tegra3 have already been benchmarked. A5X has 6X the fill-rate and MANY TIMES the graphics performance.

Just stop talking about things you clearly know NOTHING about Fandroid.

Reality: A Fandroid’s worst nightmare.

The fill rate is 6X the Tegra3 speed.  Sorry Fandroid.  Reality must hurt.

New gen Exynos SoCs are suppossed to be running arm coretex A15 cores on the cpu end, vs the cortex A9 the Apple A5 is based on. Cortex A15 cores are IIRC 100% faster than the A9 cores clock for clock, oh and did I mention the new Exynos is going to run at 1.5Ghz?

Processing power wise on the CPU end that should be equivalent to a Tegra 3 running 3Ghz. would be bad of me to make a comparison between a dual-core and quad-core though So i’ll leave the A5x out of this comparison.

Also, IIRC the new Exynos should be running the Mali-T604 GPU when it rolls out which should be 2x as fast as the mali-400 MP and has  OpenGL ES 1.1 & 2.0, OpenVG 1.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11 and Renderscript support.

Also my mind=blown @ the fact that we will have DX11 capable phones before the year is out…

Next thing you know, everyone will be asking if your phone can play crysis…

And the A5X is a dual core processor.  Tegra 3 is a  4+1 processor.  It just doesn’t stack up.

in other words, apple’s ipad 3 is 65nm process hardware running on vapor and the excitement of hipsters.  It just doesn’t stack up. 

Second of all the A5x as far as I can tell, is exactly the same as the A5 in every possible way, except the 4G LTE capabilities and the quad-core graphics. Apple haven’t stated the CPU clock speeds, but them pulling such a move suggests that they’d keep it around the 1GHz clock speed region. Now back to the GPU, and then go with Apple’s suggestion that the PowerVR GPU in the A5 is twice as fast as the GeForce ULP in the Tegra. Now Apple say that the Quadcore PowerVR in the A5x is twice as fast as the one in the A5. Now Apple are correct, but to anyone who doesn’t know about Graphics processing (i.e. general public), they’d be right. However, Apple doubled the GPU cores, and also doubled the resolution, and I’m sorry to announce that they’d be pretty much no performance change between the iPad 2 and the upcoming iPad. Most of those extra cores are dealing with the increased resolution. I’d reckon you’d get a maximum of 30% increase in GPU performance.

But bravo Apple, good marketing, the A5x would be an absolute beast in the iPad 2…

Second of all the A5x as far as I can tell, is exactly the same as the A5 in every possible way, except the 4G LTE capabilities and the quad-core graphics. Apple haven’t stated the CPU clock speeds, but them pulling such a move suggests that they’d keep it around the 1GHz clock speed region. Now back to the GPU, and then go with Apple’s suggestion that the PowerVR GPU in the A5 is twice as fast as the GeForce ULP in the Tegra. Now Apple say that the Quadcore PowerVR in the A5x is twice as fast as the one in the A5. Now Apple are correct, but to anyone who doesn’t know about Graphics processing (i.e. general public), they’d be right. However, Apple doubled the GPU cores, and also doubled the resolution, and I’m sorry to announce that they’d be pretty much no performance change between the iPad 2 and the upcoming iPad. Most of those extra cores are dealing with the increased resolution. I’d reckon you’d get a maximum of 30% increase in GPU performance.

But bravo Apple, good marketing, the A5x would be an absolute beast in the iPad 2…

Every dog is the lion of his street…!!

hmmm !!

Try Anandtech, they actually test these things.  They side with Apple.

Sorry geek, you lose again.

Anandtech already did the A5 vs Tegra3 benchmark.  The A5 blew the Tegra3 out of the water on graphics.  The A5X will utterly destroy it.

Sorry.

And The A5X graphics are 2X the A5.  Hence 4X.  Sorry, do facts make you upset?

And The A5X graphics are 2X the A5.  Hence 4X.  Sorry, do facts make you upset?

Got OWNED in their previous specialty (graphics).

Now they are MULTIPLE generations behind.

C = multiplier constant(const 133)
Oc = original clock
COc = competition original clock
Fc = Cook’s Constant ((√4)(√4))
Nc1 = Competitor Cores
Nc2 = Apple Device Cores
NCs1 = Core state adjustment 1 = (COc/C)
NCs2 = Core state adjustment 2 = (OC/C)

FCa = Core Adjustment = NCs2+(NCs1-NCs2)
GtI = Clock Adjustment = FCa/100

As = (Nc1Nc2)(((FCa)Fc)(NCs1))

Round As up to nearest whole number for marketing purposes

No benchmark required!

C = multiplier constant(const 133)
Oc = original clock
COc = competition original clock
Fc = Cook’s Constant ((√4)(√4))
Nc1 = Competitor Cores
Nc2 = Apple Device Cores
NCs1 = Core state adjustment 1 = (COc/C)
NCs2 = Core state adjustment 2 = (OC/C)

FCa = Core Adjustment = NCs2+(NCs1-NCs2)
GtI = Clock Adjustment = FCa/100

As = (Nc1Nc2)(((FCa)Fc)(NCs1))

Round As up to nearest whole number for marketing purposes

No benchmark required!

Bliss must be nice.

Bliss must be nice.

I’m not personally interested in anything 40nm/Cortex A9 now, I don’t find Tegra 3 all that useful – more Cortex A9 cores isn’t going to do anything in terms of usable performance, not going to speed up web browsing for example.

More interested in 28nm Qualcomm Krait and A15 as you mentioned, they’re just way ahead of Tegra 3 where it counts 

Neither this new iPad or the Tegra 3 take advantage of the next gen technology starting to come out this year like Cortex A15 and 28nm fabrication.  So it won’t be that long before we see other products come out with even better performance offerings during the second half of the year.