Comments on: AMD K10 Benchmarks – They don’t look good, but there’s still hope http://www.slashgear.com/amd-k10-benchmarks-they-dont-look-good-but-theres-still-hope-317090/ Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions Tue, 15 May 2012 01:28:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: AMD Opteron http://www.slashgear.com/amd-k10-benchmarks-they-dont-look-good-but-theres-still-hope-317090/#comment-27664 AMD Opteron Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:28:57 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/amd-k10-benchmarks-they-dont-look-good-but-theres-still-hope-317090.php#comment-27664 LOL HT is disabled thats the power of the AMD, and you bench marked an 8 core system with A single thread app,thats just stupid. I saw these single thread benches coming I knew people would do that, BENCH IT ON SOMETHING THAT CAN USE ALL 8 COREs

LOOK AT THIS BENCH MARK OF K10

http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=41970

]]> By: yeek http://www.slashgear.com/amd-k10-benchmarks-they-dont-look-good-but-theres-still-hope-317090/#comment-27655 yeek Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:38:43 +0000 http://www.slashgear.com/amd-k10-benchmarks-they-dont-look-good-but-theres-still-hope-317090.php#comment-27655 I don’t like to use SuperPi to test system performance as this program is not well written.

Instead, I prefer QuickPi (http://home.istar.ca/~lyster/pi.html).

On my laptop which has a AMD Turion TL-60 CPU, it take 1.3seocnds to calculate PI to 1m digits, and 7.56 seocnds to 4m digits.

Remember, when you testing such program, don’t take the time by counting the watch, because, it takes time to print out 4m digits on the screen. Try to redirect the output to a file, and read the total time in the file.

]]>