<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe draws ire for paid Photoshop security update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/adobe-draws-ire-for-paid-photoshop-security-update-10227717/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/adobe-draws-ire-for-paid-photoshop-security-update-10227717/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manfred Higgs</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/adobe-draws-ire-for-paid-photoshop-security-update-10227717/#comment-209878</link>
		<dc:creator>Manfred Higgs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 07:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=227717#comment-209878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That seems likely. Adobe constantly fixes security issues across it&#039;s products I doubt they would deny Photoshop their flag ship product. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That seems likely. Adobe constantly fixes security issues across it&#8217;s products I doubt they would deny Photoshop their flag ship product. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/adobe-draws-ire-for-paid-photoshop-security-update-10227717/#comment-209820</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 23:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=227717#comment-209820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read the advisory. It said there was upgrade for cs5 release for windows and mac. It also said the cs6 upgrade fixes this as well. I suspect it was a poorly worded advisory, or more likely marketing people got involved in trying to improve odds of people upgrading and instead it backfired a bit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the advisory. It said there was upgrade for cs5 release for windows and mac. It also said the cs6 upgrade fixes this as well. I suspect it was a poorly worded advisory, or more likely marketing people got involved in trying to improve odds of people upgrading and instead it backfired a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pheckphul</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/adobe-draws-ire-for-paid-photoshop-security-update-10227717/#comment-209810</link>
		<dc:creator>Pheckphul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 22:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=227717#comment-209810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Adobe does indeed refuse to patch this vulnerability for software that is only two years old it will only be providing fuel for the move to opensource alternatives. It could also induce more people to obtain their Adobe software by unorthodox means.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Adobe does indeed refuse to patch this vulnerability for software that is only two years old it will only be providing fuel for the move to opensource alternatives. It could also induce more people to obtain their Adobe software by unorthodox means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
