<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2012 Chevy Sonic gets 40 MPG on highway with 1.4L turbo power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/2012-chevy-sonic-gets-40-mpg-on-highway-with-1-4l-turbo-power-16180422/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/2012-chevy-sonic-gets-40-mpg-on-highway-with-1-4l-turbo-power-16180422/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 17:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Koutroulakis</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/2012-chevy-sonic-gets-40-mpg-on-highway-with-1-4l-turbo-power-16180422/#comment-136637</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Koutroulakis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 02:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=180422#comment-136637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Shane... after today&#039;s fiasco with the boxster... maybe this is what I need lol :/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Shane&#8230; after today&#8217;s fiasco with the boxster&#8230; maybe this is what I need lol :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Beddow</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/2012-chevy-sonic-gets-40-mpg-on-highway-with-1-4l-turbo-power-16180422/#comment-136558</link>
		<dc:creator>James Beddow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 17:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=180422#comment-136558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I&#039;m surprised they aren&#039;t popular, what with the performance of modern diesels. With their huge amounts of low down torque and great economy I&#039;d have thought they&#039;d be a decent alternative to large, inefficient petrol engines. I&#039;ve been in a friend&#039;s 2 litre diesel Audi A4, and its performance is amazing! (and before anyone asks, no, I drive a petrol)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m surprised they aren&#8217;t popular, what with the performance of modern diesels. With their huge amounts of low down torque and great economy I&#8217;d have thought they&#8217;d be a decent alternative to large, inefficient petrol engines. I&#8217;ve been in a friend&#8217;s 2 litre diesel Audi A4, and its performance is amazing! (and before anyone asks, no, I drive a petrol)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane McGlaun</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/2012-chevy-sonic-gets-40-mpg-on-highway-with-1-4l-turbo-power-16180422/#comment-136499</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane McGlaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 13:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=180422#comment-136499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Too bad we don&#039;t have access to some of the diesel engines the UK gets here in the States.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad we don&#8217;t have access to some of the diesel engines the UK gets here in the States.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Beddow</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/2012-chevy-sonic-gets-40-mpg-on-highway-with-1-4l-turbo-power-16180422/#comment-136495</link>
		<dc:creator>James Beddow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 13:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=180422#comment-136495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s neither &#039;sporty&#039;, nor economical. 
VW Polo GTi has a 1.4 engine, does 180bhp, 6.9 seconds 0-60, and 47.9 mpg (UK) combined. A Vauxhall Corsa 1.7 Diesel has 130 bhp, does 0-60 in 8.9 seconds, and does 62.8 mpg (uk) combined... ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s neither &#8216;sporty&#8217;, nor economical. <br />
VW Polo GTi has a 1.4 engine, does 180bhp, 6.9 seconds 0-60, and 47.9 mpg (UK) combined. A Vauxhall Corsa 1.7 Diesel has 130 bhp, does 0-60 in 8.9 seconds, and does 62.8 mpg (uk) combined&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Beddow</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/2012-chevy-sonic-gets-40-mpg-on-highway-with-1-4l-turbo-power-16180422/#comment-136496</link>
		<dc:creator>James Beddow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 13:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=180422#comment-136496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s neither &#039;sporty&#039;, nor economical. 
VW Polo GTi has a 1.4 engine, does 180bhp, 6.9 seconds 0-60, and 47.9 mpg (UK) combined. A Vauxhall Corsa 1.7 Diesel has 130 bhp, does 0-60 in 8.9 seconds, and does 62.8 mpg (uk) combined... ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s neither &#8216;sporty&#8217;, nor economical. <br />
VW Polo GTi has a 1.4 engine, does 180bhp, 6.9 seconds 0-60, and 47.9 mpg (UK) combined. A Vauxhall Corsa 1.7 Diesel has 130 bhp, does 0-60 in 8.9 seconds, and does 62.8 mpg (uk) combined&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S R</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/2012-chevy-sonic-gets-40-mpg-on-highway-with-1-4l-turbo-power-16180422/#comment-136494</link>
		<dc:creator>S R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=180422#comment-136494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not bad but...

2010 Scion xD 5sp stock: 0-60=7.9sec; 128hp; mpg=42hwy ( @65mph) 36mpg city (REAL WORLD NOT EPA THEORETICAL) $14985.00

Soooo...Sonic not really that impressive (at least not in these stat areas)
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not bad but&#8230;</p>
<p>2010 Scion xD 5sp stock: 0-60=7.9sec; 128hp; mpg=42hwy ( @65mph) 36mpg city (REAL WORLD NOT EPA THEORETICAL) $14985.00</p>
<p>Soooo&#8230;Sonic not really that impressive (at least not in these stat areas)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
