The PC manufacturers make RAZOR THIS margins.

Of course, thats by selling sub $500 crap.

The PC manufacturers make RAZOR THIS margins.

Of course, thats by selling sub $500 crap.

The PC manufacturers make RAZOR THIS margins.

Of course, thats by selling sub $500 crap.

The PC manufacturers make RAZOR THIS margins.

Of course, thats by selling sub $500 crap.

Unless you are outside the USA this argument is invalid.

Unless you are outside the USA this argument is invalid.

Unless you are outside the USA this argument is invalid.

Unless you are outside the USA this argument is invalid.

I can use the same example with Mercedes, and many other manufacturers.  I agree you will not have as good of quailty with the cheaper item versus the more expensive one.  But most people don’t care they want to say they own a “Apple, Mercedes, etc.”  Now yes Mac computers are better and nicer, quality I can’t say that as much.  I have owned Mac computers, quality is on par with other brands and are slightly over priced for what they are.  More people would buy a mac computer if they were competively priced with other computers of equal specs.  If they dropped their price to be more in line with what it is you will see more sold.

Does that help you understand the easy debunking of this article.  People will buy a $100 ipod and use it with a Windows based computer because they dont want to have to pay the extra 1.5x-3x the price of an equally spec’d Mac.  Windows are just cheaper therefore people will buy those computers and use the extra money for other things.

I can use the same example with Mercedes, and many other manufacturers.  I agree you will not have as good of quailty with the cheaper item versus the more expensive one.  But most people don’t care they want to say they own a “Apple, Mercedes, etc.”  Now yes Mac computers are better and nicer, quality I can’t say that as much.  I have owned Mac computers, quality is on par with other brands and are slightly over priced for what they are.  More people would buy a mac computer if they were competively priced with other computers of equal specs.  If they dropped their price to be more in line with what it is you will see more sold.

Does that help you understand the easy debunking of this article.  People will buy a $100 ipod and use it with a Windows based computer because they dont want to have to pay the extra 1.5x-3x the price of an equally spec’d Mac.  Windows are just cheaper therefore people will buy those computers and use the extra money for other things.

I can use the same example with Mercedes, and many other manufacturers.  I agree you will not have as good of quailty with the cheaper item versus the more expensive one.  But most people don’t care they want to say they own a “Apple, Mercedes, etc.”  Now yes Mac computers are better and nicer, quality I can’t say that as much.  I have owned Mac computers, quality is on par with other brands and are slightly over priced for what they are.  More people would buy a mac computer if they were competively priced with other computers of equal specs.  If they dropped their price to be more in line with what it is you will see more sold.

Does that help you understand the easy debunking of this article.  People will buy a $100 ipod and use it with a Windows based computer because they dont want to have to pay the extra 1.5x-3x the price of an equally spec’d Mac.  Windows are just cheaper therefore people will buy those computers and use the extra money for other things.

I can use the same example with Mercedes, and many other manufacturers.  I agree you will not have as good of quailty with the cheaper item versus the more expensive one.  But most people don’t care they want to say they own a “Apple, Mercedes, etc.”  Now yes Mac computers are better and nicer, quality I can’t say that as much.  I have owned Mac computers, quality is on par with other brands and are slightly over priced for what they are.  More people would buy a mac computer if they were competively priced with other computers of equal specs.  If they dropped their price to be more in line with what it is you will see more sold.

Does that help you understand the easy debunking of this article.  People will buy a $100 ipod and use it with a Windows based computer because they dont want to have to pay the extra 1.5x-3x the price of an equally spec’d Mac.  Windows are just cheaper therefore people will buy those computers and use the extra money for other things.

Who wants the new HP Z1 AIO workstation like me?  That thing is amazing and just what I want.  Puts the iMac into a deep hole to climb out of.  You can do whatever upgrades you want on it instead of going to a “genius” at a store.

just sayin

My bet is that they will eventually have to merge iOS and OS X for it to be touch.  Then they will be following in Windows footsteps.  Will there be outcrys like we are seeing with Windows 8?  I bet we wont, which is very htpocritical.

$100 vs. $2000, I will take a $100 device.  People buy it more for the “status symbol” that is why you see more iOS devices sold, it is really not that hard to figure out.

My bet is that they will eventually have to merge iOS and OS X for it to be touch.  Then they will be following in Windows footsteps.  Will there be outcrys like we are seeing with Windows 8?  I bet we wont, which is very htpocritical.

$100 vs. $2000, I will take a $100 device.  People buy it more for the “status symbol” that is why you see more iOS devices sold, it is really not that hard to figure out.

My bet is that they will eventually have to merge iOS and OS X for it to be touch.  Then they will be following in Windows footsteps.  Will there be outcrys like we are seeing with Windows 8?  I bet we wont, which is very htpocritical.

$100 vs. $2000, I will take a $100 device.  People buy it more for the “status symbol” that is why you see more iOS devices sold, it is really not that hard to figure out.