<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 178m Ultrabook shipments predicted for 2016, but tablets still ahead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashgear.com/178m-ultrabook-shipments-predicted-for-2016-but-tablets-still-ahead-24210459/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashgear.com/178m-ultrabook-shipments-predicted-for-2016-but-tablets-still-ahead-24210459/</link>
	<description>Feeding Your Gadget and Tech Obsessions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 14:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/178m-ultrabook-shipments-predicted-for-2016-but-tablets-still-ahead-24210459/#comment-175434</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210459#comment-175434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tablet Crunch, what about the possibility that Intel is subsidizing Ultrabooks to get back at Apple for testing AMD processors in the Macbook Air back in late 2010?   My understanding is that it worked... Apple dropped plans for AMD, but it looks like Intel ain&#039;t gonna let up on the pain!  Haha.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tablet Crunch, what about the possibility that Intel is subsidizing Ultrabooks to get back at Apple for testing AMD processors in the Macbook Air back in late 2010?   My understanding is that it worked&#8230; Apple dropped plans for AMD, but it looks like Intel ain&#8217;t gonna let up on the pain!  Haha.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tablet Crunch</title>
		<link>http://www.slashgear.com/178m-ultrabook-shipments-predicted-for-2016-but-tablets-still-ahead-24210459/#comment-175409</link>
		<dc:creator>Tablet Crunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashgear.com/?p=210459#comment-175409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I understand that Intel is trying to come up with an answer to AMD processors running in tablets.  But if they (Intel) really want to compete and start stealing market share from tablets, or at least put a speed bump in tablet growth, they need to partner with content developers (i.e. Amazon&#039;s model) and offer the content through their Ultrabooks.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand that Intel is trying to come up with an answer to AMD processors running in tablets.  But if they (Intel) really want to compete and start stealing market share from tablets, or at least put a speed bump in tablet growth, they need to partner with content developers (i.e. Amazon&#8217;s model) and offer the content through their Ultrabooks.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
